Header
Explosive- Planned Parrenthood says children as young a 10 should be seen as "sexual beings"  |  Yeah, but Obama was talking to the press- Andrea Mitchell mocks Palin's use of hand notes  |  No end in sight for AGW fraud- IPCC report relied on "no evidence" for one claim  |  Democratic Senator says tea partiers don't really know what is happening in the U.S.  |  House Dem begs Senate to pass jobs bill  |  Barry O! hired 24,000 permanent federal workers in January- while nation lost 5.1 million jobs since he took office  |  Cratering- BarryO! did not bring the change independents had hoped for  |  Q: How many 25-54's are watching Fox at 3 A.M.? A: More than are watching CNN in prime time  |  Does Paul Ryan have right answer for nation's solvency? George Will thinks so  |  Stossel compares Barry O! to Agnew, calls him a cry baby

Get Our RSS Feeds
Other Feeds

Edge News

Herald-Leader

Local

Breaking News

Politics

State

CNN

Top Stories

World

U.S.

Politics

Law

Technology

Science & Space

Health

FOX News

US & World

Politics

Business

Health

FOX Life

Views

FOX Blogs

New York Times

Arts

Automobiles

Books

Business

Circuits

Dining & Wine

Editorils/Op-ED

Education

Fashion & Style

Health

Home & Garden

International

Magazine

Media & Advertising

Most Emailed Articles

Movie News

Movie Reviews

Multimedia

National

New York Region

Obituaries

Real Estate

Science

Sports

Technology

Television News

Theater

Travel

Washington

Week In Review

Washington Post

Top News

Politics

Nation

World

Metro

Style

Business

Technology

Health

Education

Real Estate

Editorials

Sports

Newsweek - Top Stories

ESPN

Top Headlines

NFL

NBA

MLB

NHL

Soccer

College Basketball

College Football

Bill Simmons


Favorite Links
Organizations
NRA
MinuteMan Project

Our Favorites
Kentucky News Center
Kentuckyvotes.org
FOX News
Drudge Report
Real Clear Politics
TownHall.com
bipps.org
clubforgrowth.org
Erwin Roberts

National Blogs
PowerLine
anklebitingpundits
Polipundit.com
Conservative Republican

State Blogs
Doug Petch
MuckRacker
The Hamilton Observer
Kentucky Progress
The Cyber Hillbilly
On The Right
Kentucky Blog watch
Blue Grass, Red State
ConservaChick

Intl Blogs
Young Unionist

Democrats
Ralph Long

Satire
Guns 'n' Butter

Shopping
Liberty Tree Gear
Ebay
Amazon.com
Sears
DigZag.com

Help Wanted
Monster.com

Sports
ESPN.com
Radio Gator

Useful Information
KY Sex Offenders List
P-E-r-k.org

Miscellaneous
Cameron Mills Ministries
onyekwuluje.com


Archives
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
Current

Republican Party Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

A Health Care Plan for a Free Nation

Since the majority of the media seems only interested in disseminating the duel myths that conservatives are both anti-health care reform and racist for opposing President Obama’s “public option” plan, I offer the following five point proposal for reforming the American health system in hopes of returning the public discourse to the important issues at hand. 

 
  1. Return more of each individual’s earned proceeds to their pockets. We should offer a 5% tax reduction in all income tax brackets. We should extend this same reduction across the board to all businesses, regardless of their size. By putting more money back in the pockets of individuals and companies, more money is instantly available for the purchase and upgrade of health care policies.  This also doubles as an economic stimulus package without the pork.
 
  1. Put a cap on the amount of damages that can be won for medical malpractice. People who’ve been unduly harmed by a doctor’s mistake should have legal recourse, but there is no need to make instant billionaires. This important step would lower the overall cost of health care by lowering medical malpractice premiums for doctors. 
 
  1. Allow individuals to buy policies across state lines. If one can find a better dental policy in Florida and a better surgery policy in New Jersey for a better price, then they should be allowed to make that purchase. Currently we can buy any product we wish in another state, except insurance. This reform would increase competition lowering the overall cost of health care and allowing individuals to have a more custom policy that better suits their needs.
 
  1. Increase regulations on health insurance companies. Not the crazy labyrinth of senseless bureaucratic regulations, but the ones that make sense, like if you pay a policy premium then you should expect your coverage to kick in when it’s needed. No exceptions, no loopholes. A policy is a contract; both sides should be required to uphold their end of the bargain.
 
  1. Remove the cap on the amount that an individual can put into a Health Savings Account (HSA) and allow the money to roll over every year and grow. We should also allow banks to compete for these accounts by offering better interest rates. Like an IRA, it would be tax free as long as the money remains in the account. If you take it out for any reason other than medical, applicable taxes would be paid on the earnings. It’s your money, you should keep it. Many people go for years without any major medical issues.   Imagine a man who’s been healthy most of his life and has amassed $50,000 in his HSA. He is diagnosed with cancer at age 65. His customized catastrophic health policy covers the majority of the cost, but his HSA will take care of the rest. 
 
 
This plan is both constitutional and entirely free market based; we wouldn’t have to give up an ounce of our liberty or any of the quality of our current system. The end result is more people will have access because the cost will be lower. 
President Obama’s plan may provide some sort of rationed care for everyone, but at what cost in quality of care, national debt and liberty to the nation? 
 
This plan is a better starting place for a discussion than the irresponsible pattern of playing the race card or repeating the mantra that conservatives want to keep the status quo. 
 
President Obama himself said that if we had any ideas we should put them on the table. Well, here’s my idea, officially on the table.
 
Leland Conway is the Executive Editor and Co-Founder of www.conservativeedge.com and the Host of the Pulse of Lexington on News Radio 630 WLAP.

  

Posted By:Leland Conway @ 9/20/2009 5:05:00 PM  |    | 

 


Comments

Excellent plan!  I think it only lacks something in controlling the costs of health care.  Savvy consumers already shop for the best price of most things they purchase - from eggs to a gallon of gasoline.  Leland makes the point in allowing more insurance companies into the mix, there by promoting more competition and better pricing.  Shopping for the best price is a key element to lower costs.  

Medical providers and drug companies, functioning in a free market, should be forthcoming with the price of products and procedures, even to the extent of advertising them.  Consumers need to be at least as frugal with their health purchases as they are when shopping for groceries, whether they are paying for the services directly, or paying for them indirectly through an insurer.


keith @ 9/22/2009 4:38:00 PM

Great points!  I also wonder about the possibility of regulating the percentage of medical claims won by a plaintiff that the plaintiff's lawyer can take.  I haven't thought through the implications or legalities of this, but it seems to me that often times the winner gets too small a percentage of the award.

Perhaps on medical claims, we could cap the award amounts and get more of that money to the victims.  Perhaps this would help to limit frivolous/spurious claims? 

Again, I dont know about the pros and cons of this, but it might be something to consider.


bartb @ 9/21/2009 8:37:00 PM

Get Involved
Name :  
E-Mail :    
Enter the code shown:

Our Most recent Articles

What others are saying

Login
User Name:
Password:
Register Now!
Forgot Password

Our sponsors